Thu, 10\/24\/2013 – by Carl Gibson<\/a><\/p>\n Early in the morning on June 18, a brand new Mercedes C250 coupe was driving through the Melrose intersection on Highland Avenue in Hollywood when suddenly, out of nowhere, it sped up. According to an eye-witness, the car accelerated rapidly, bounced several times then fishtailed out of control before it slammed into a palm tree and burst into flames, ejecting its engine<\/a> some 200 feet away.<\/p>\n A witness, Jose Rubalcalva, whose house stood adjacent to the crash, told Ana Kasparian<\/a> of The Young Turks news network that no one could approach the burning car because it kept exploding<\/a>. In a simulated full-frontal crash<\/a> of a 2013 C250 coupe, the car doesn\u2019t explode on impact nor does it launch its engine 200 feet.<\/p>\n In fact, said Nael Issa, a Mercedes Benz dealer in Long Beach, \u201cThe car has a crumble zone, so when it crashes it goes in like an accordion. And in some cases the engine drops down, so it doesn\u2019t go into you.\u201d<\/p>\n The driver in the fatal crash was Michael Hastings<\/a>, a 33-year-old crack investigative reporter for Rolling Stone magazine, whose June 2010 article, \u201cThe Runaway General<\/a>,\u201d exposed the behind-the-scenes failure of top U.S. General Stanley McChrystal\u2019s counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan\u2014and, even more damagingly, revealed McChrystal’s mocking attitude toward the Obama administration, which ultimately led to the general\u2019s resignation.<\/p>\n Four months after Hastings\u2019s so-called accident, and despite scant coverage in the mainstream media, new facts and evidence continue to emerge raising serious unanswered questions about whether the journalist was assassinated, the breadth of unconventional cyber-techniques that may have been used, and who might have been responsible.<\/p>\n Threats, Fears and Lies<\/b><\/p>\n Hastings\u2019s pivotal article for Rolling Stone actually went beyond revealing Gen. McChrystal\u2019s flawed leadership of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and his scorn for the Commander-in-Chief. In addition it drew on McChrystal\u2019s former role as the commander of Joint Special Operations Command, or JSOC, a covert elite unit whose kill operations are routinely unaccountable to government, resulting in scores of civilian deaths by U.S. hands in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere that have gone unexamined and unpunished. (JSOC’s activities feature prominently in the book “Dirty Wars” by investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill, which was subsequently made into an award-winning film that premiered<\/a> at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival.<\/p>\n Hastings continued to report stories that illuminated the darker side of U.S. military actions, including an investigation<\/a> into the Army\u2019s deployment of psyops, or psychological operations, on U.S. senators visiting combat zones in order to secure more war funding.<\/p>\n In Hastings\u2019s 2012 book, “The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America\u2019s War in Afghanistan,” Hastings wrote about being approached by one of Gen. McChrystal\u2019s aides. \u201cWe\u2019ll hunt you down and kill you if we don\u2019t like what you write,\u201d said the unnamed aide, who afterwards apologized<\/a> to Hastings for his remarks.<\/p>\n Hastings later wrote<\/a>, \u201cI wasn\u2019t disturbed by the claim. Whenever I\u2019d been reporting around groups of dudes whose job it was to kill people, one of them would usually mention that they were going to kill me.\u201d<\/p>\n But never did those fears escalate the way they did during the final days and moments of Hastings\u2019s life.<\/p>\n L.A. Weekly interviewed<\/a> Hastings’s neighbor, Jordanna Thigpen, who said Hastings was convinced that he was a target of surveillance after reading about the Department of Justice\u2019s seizure of AP phone records in May. He became even more wary, she said, when details about the NSA\u2019s domestic spying programs emerged in early June through former contractor Edward Snowden.<\/p>\n “He was scared, and he wanted to leave town,” Thigpen said.<\/p>\n The story that Hastings was working on<\/a> at the time of his death centered around CIA Director John Brennan, the chief architect of President Obama\u2019s foreign drone program. It related specifically to Brennan\u2019s role as the administration\u2019s point man tracking investigative journalists and their sources in Washington.<\/p>\n An email from Stratfor, a CIA-connected private security firm whose emails were hacked and released to the public by Wikileaks in February of last year, reveals that Brennan was indeed behind the \u201cwitch hunts of investigative journalists.\u201d<\/p>\n The night of his death, Hastings had contacted<\/a> Wikileaks attorney Jennifer Robinson and sent an email to his colleagues at the news site BuzzFeed, saying he was working on a big story and was \u201cgoing off the rada[r],\u201d citing fears over federal authorities interviewing his friends. Hastings blind-copied his friend, the Staff Sgt. Joe Biggs, whom Hastings had known from his time embedded in Afghanistan.<\/p>\n According to L.A. Weekly, just hours before the deadly crash Hastings had asked to borrow his neighbor’s Volvo because he suspected his own car’s computer system had been hacked.<\/p>\n The Los Angeles Police Department said repeatedly it suspects no foul play<\/a>. Questioned after Hastings\u2019s death, the FBI confirmed that the journalist was not under any investigation.<\/p>\n But those statements were directly contradicted in September when redacted FBI documents surfaced<\/a> following a Freedom of Information Act request by the news network Al Jazeera, which showed that Hastings was in fact under investigation for a story in which he had interviewed a U.S. soldier who had been captured in Afghanistan.<\/p>\n Is This What Cyber-Assassination Looks Like?<\/b><\/p>\n In an era of unsanctioned drone warfare\u2014where a man operating a joystick in New Mexico can carry out the remote-controlled assassination of any person worldwide who shows up on the President\u2019s \u201ckill list\u201d\u2014it may not be far-fetched to imagine that similar capabilities, and techniques, are being employed closer to home.<\/p>\n Richard Clarke, the counterterrorism chief under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, told the Huffington Post<\/a> that Hastings\u2019s crash looked \u201cconsistent with a car cyber attack.\u201d<\/p>\n What did he mean? According to Stefan Savage, a computer science professor at the University of California, San Diego, any modern vehicle\u2019s computer system made by any manufacturer can be hacked.<\/p>\n In a phone interview with Occupy.com, Savage described a series of experiments that he and his team conducted, in which they remotely hacked<\/a> a car\u2019s computer systems. \u201cIf you\u2019re talking about where people have arbitrary control of a car, that takes a significant amount of time,\u201d Savage said. \u201cIf you want to take it over and break it, that\u2019s less complicated.\u201d<\/p>\n Savage explained that all computers in a car are connected to one another, bridged by one component and compromised by that same component. As a result, he said, “We could listen to conversations in the car, and could take over everything in the drivetrain, like acceleration and brakes, through a cellular network.\u201d<\/p>\n In terms of range and power to manipulate a vehicle remotely, he said, \u201cWe found vulnerabilities from 1,000 miles away.”<\/p>\n After the successful experiments were reported, Savage noted a huge response from manufacturers that spurred new innovations in cybersecurity for car computer systems. \u201cThey\u2019ve spent millions of dollars on hiring new people, and acknowledged that [cybersecurity] is something they need to take seriously,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n After the fiery crash, Hastings\u2019s charred remains were quickly cremated, but not before the L.A. coroner released a report<\/a> indicating the journalist had trace amounts of methamphetamine and marijuana in his system. Mainstream media jumped on the angle, eager to dismiss Hastings’s complex backstory in favor of the simpler line: he was another young, talented, but out-of-control drug addict who had tragically ended his own life.<\/p>\n Despite NBC Southern California plainly reporting<\/a> that the drugs in Hastings\u2019s body were ruled to have had nothing to do with the crash, it didn\u2019t stop<\/a> the media from smearing Hastings<\/a> in its coverage<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen Michael embarrassed [the media] by writing a story about what the military is actually up to, the universal refrain was, \u2018How dare you!\u2019\u201d said Cenk Uygur<\/a>, host of The Young Turks and a friend of Hastings. \u201cAnytime someone sticks their head up and doesn\u2019t go along, they\u2019re universally despised by the establishment. They were jealous of him, too. The media was not a fan of Michael, at all.\u201d<\/p>\n On a CNN segment broadcast shortly after Gen. McChrystal\u2019s forced resignation, CBS chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan said<\/a>, \u201cMichael Hastings has never served his country the way McChrystal has.\u201d Hastings\u2019s \u201cRunaway General\u201d article had drawn Pentagon apologists out of the woodwork, who condemned him for breaking what anonymous sources for the Washington Post<\/a> and ABC News called unspoken journalistic ground rules.<\/p>\n As Uygur further explained: \u201cAll the large media conglomerates have some tie to getting contracts from the government. Whether Comcast needed approval for a merger, or GE needed a defense contract, every one of those giant corporations needs something from the government. So it\u2019s become a synergistic environment\u2014Comcast gives the government something, the government gives Comcast something else.<\/p>\n \u201cThe implicit message is: Don\u2019t rock the boat, and keep the gravy train coming,\u201d Uygur said.<\/p>\n A Chilling Brand of Outsourcing<\/b><\/p>\n In the last four months, amid heightened tensions over government spying and a widening pursuit of whistleblowers, many have speculated that Hastings\u2019s death was the product of a conspiracy<\/a> involving the CIA, NSA, FBI or other federal agencies. What has been less discussed is the possibility that Hastings was assassinated by private contractors\u2014conceivably the same types who were involved or affiliated with operations in Iraq or Afghanistan, thousands of whom remain active today<\/a>.<\/p>\n Even after private defense contractors committed gross and punishable offenses overseas, those same firms continue to receive no-bid contracts from the U.S. government with zero accountability for their crimes. KBR\u2019s showers electrocuted troops<\/a> while their administrators forced gang-rape victims to sign mandatory arbitration agreements<\/a> that prevented them from suing. Halliburton overcharged<\/a> the government by tens of millions of dollars. And Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater\/Xe, was himself implicated in a murder and has spoken of leading an anti-Muslim crusade through his company.<\/p>\n This infographic<\/a> shows the alarming amount of money\u2014some $3.3 trillion\u2014spent on private military contractors since 9\/11. But what rarely gets discussed, beyond the dollars wasted and the crimes committed by private war-profiteering corporations, is the pervasive, growing sense of domination of these mega-firms in the past decade that have solidified their rule over U.S. military and foreign policy decisions.<\/p>\n The question that Hastings\u2019s unexplained death poses is whether those same private, militarized forces may be bringing the war home as they deploy technology and battlefield-honed tactics to ensure that deeper truths remain unseen — and that nothing threatens the bottom line.<\/p>\n \u201cThe government empowers these private individuals and corporations to do almost everything they want,” continued Uygur, “including hiring them to kill people. And you\u2019re going to be surprised when they keep doing that with the same impunity they\u2019ve always had? It\u2019s only a matter of time.\u201d<\/p>\n Hastings was a frequent contributor to The Young Turks, and Uygur said when Hastings moved to Los Angeles, they often talked before and after each show. Uygur said there were a lot of private contractors who didn\u2019t like Hastings.<\/p>\n \u201cAt some point,\u201d Uygur suggested, \u201cwill they take the law into their own hands, and say, \u2018Well, if we were hired to kill people in Iraq and Afghanistan, why not kill them over here?\u2019 Have they done that? I have no idea.\u201d<\/p>\n In Search of the Facts<\/b><\/p>\n Just south of the Melrose intersection on Highland Avenue, in Hollywood\u2019s Hancock Park neighborhood, the palm tree where Michael Hastings\u2019s car crashed and exploded in flames in June remains scorched black<\/a> about 20 feet high. Parts of the car are buried<\/a> in the base of the tree, where a poster<\/a> is attached that reads, \u201cTHE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE\u201d on one line, and \u201c#HASTINGS\u201d on another. A military medal<\/a> is also pinned to the tree, and these photos<\/a> taken by a local woman of the Hastings memorial<\/a> show it at its busiest earlier in the summer.<\/p>\n “His friends and family who know him, everyone says he drives like a grandma, so that right there doesn’t seem like something that he would be doing,\u201d said Hastings\u2019s friend, the Staff Sgt. Joe Biggs, in an interview with Fox News’s Megyn Kelly one week after the crash. \u201cHe had a lot of friends and family that cared about him. He had a good life to live. There’s no way he would be acting erratic like that and acting that out of control.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"hastings\"](\"https:\/\/cldc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/hastings.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n