{"id":9217,"date":"2019-06-28T09:44:39","date_gmt":"2019-06-28T16:44:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/?page_id=9217"},"modified":"2026-07-15T14:57:59","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T21:57:59","slug":"anti-slapp","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/anti-slapp\/","title":{"rendered":"Defesa de Ativistas em SLAPPs e Outras Guerras Jur\u00eddicas"},"content":{"rendered":"

Defesa de Ativistas em SLAPPs e Outras Guerras Jur\u00eddicas<\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

O que \u00e9 um SLAPP Suit?<\/h3>\n

Os advogados do CLDC t\u00eam obtido sucesso na defesa de ativistas e organiza\u00e7\u00f5es de justi\u00e7a social e clim\u00e1tica contra SLAPPs (a\u00e7\u00f5es estrat\u00e9gicas contra a participa\u00e7\u00e3o p\u00fablica), que s\u00e3o projetadas para reprimir a liberdade de express\u00e3o \u2014 notavelmente o diss\u00eddio. Manipuladores corporativos com bolsos fundos t\u00eam um hist\u00f3rico longo e vergonhoso de entrar com a\u00e7\u00f5es SLAPP para intimidar ativistas e organiza\u00e7\u00f5es de justi\u00e7a clim\u00e1tica e outros movimentos progressistas. E eles continuam a entrar com elas, com o \u00fanico prop\u00f3sito de esgotar os recursos dos ativistas, desperdi\u00e7ar seu tempo (o que impacta o esfor\u00e7o que as pessoas podem contribuir para os movimentos sociais) e causar ansiedade. Todos esses fatores criam um efeito inibidor que prejudica o exerc\u00edcio da liberdade de express\u00e3o. Exemplos incluem a\u00e7\u00f5es por difama\u00e7\u00e3o (cal\u00fania e inj\u00faria) contra pessoas por simplesmente se manifestarem contra irregularidades corporativas. As a\u00e7\u00f5es SLAPP geralmente acusam o ativista ou organiza\u00e7\u00e3o r\u00e9u de difama\u00e7\u00e3o ou alguma outra forma de m\u00e1 conduta il\u00edcita, enquadrando o processo como leg\u00edtimo quando o objetivo real \u00e9 intimidar e silenciar ativistas e atingir o direito \u00e0 liberdade de express\u00e3o. O CLDC \u00e9 um especialista nacional na defesa de ativistas e suas campanhas contra a amea\u00e7a de a\u00e7\u00f5es SLAPP inconstitucionais. Temos um grande banco de peti\u00e7\u00f5es e recursos jur\u00eddicos dispon\u00edveis para advogados. Se voc\u00ea \u00e9 um advogado representando ativistas pela mudan\u00e7a ambiental ou social, por favor Entre em contato conosco.<\/a> Somos um orgulhoso e ativo membro da nacional Coaliz\u00e3o Proteja o Protesto<\/a>, que defende aqueles atacados por processos SLAPP e educa ativistas e o p\u00fablico sobre eles. Atrav\u00e9s deste processo, transmitimos, como coaliz\u00e3o, que estamos juntos e que os valent\u00f5es corporativos v\u00eam atr\u00e1s de todos n\u00f3s quando v\u00eam atr\u00e1s de um de n\u00f3s. Advogados da CLDC conseguiram que os processos SLAPP da Resolute Forest Products e da Energy Transfer Partners (agora conhecida como Energy Transfer) contra ativistas pela justi\u00e7a clim\u00e1tica fossem arquivados para nossos clientes. Tamb\u00e9m derrotamos o \u2019Nazi da Maconha\u2019 de Eugene, que tentou usar um processo SLAPP contra uma ativista antifascista baseada em Eugene quando ela foi exposta como nacionalista branca. Estamos ansiosos para conquistar mais vit\u00f3rias contra SLAPPs maliciosos!<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

\"Weed 9\" Lawsuit: Water for Citizens of Weed California et al. v. Churchwell White LLP et al.<\/h5>

CLDC lawyers provided legal support for the \u201cWeed 9,\u201d and Water for Citizens of Weed, California (WCWC), nine members of the Weed community who faced a SLAPP suit brought by Roseburg Forest Products in their effort to control a local water source. That SLAPP suit against our clients was dismissed, and our clients were awarded attorney fees under California's SLAPP statute. Roseburg Forest Products' lawsuit came in response to the nine citizen activists voicing their concerns about their small city losing access to a vital public spring water source to the interests of the private logging company. RFP's attorneys asserted that they were just trying to resolve legal ownership issues regarding the water supply, but neither WCWC nor the nine people RFP's attorneys named in the suit had ever made any personal claim to the rights or title to the water supply \u2014 a fact the law firm admitted at the time. Yet even with that knowledge, the law firm appealed the court rulings and dragged the defendants through two more years of legal proceedings. Several of the nine activists are former mayors \u2014 some who are now in their 80s and 90s. The activists had participated in town meetings and taken other grassroots actions as members of WCWC, to educate their community about the threat to their water supply. After writing a letter requesting assistance from a state agency, and speaking out during a local meeting, they found themselves in court being sued by a $900 million timber company. California's SLAPP statute also includes what is known as a \"SLAPPback\" provision, allowing people who have been hit with a SLAPP suit to turn around and sue the \"SLAPPer,\" for emotional distress damages and other remedies that go beyond an attorney fee award for having to defend the initial SLAPP suit. In April 2020 CLDC filed a SLAPPback suit against the Sacramento law firm Churchwell White LLP and two of its attorneys, alleging that they engaged in malicious and unlawful conduct when they (on behalf of their client, Roseburg Forest Products) filed the lawsuit against the Weed 9 and WCWC. We recently submitted our final brief on appeal in the \"SLAPPback\" lawsuit, and hope to have oral argument soon.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":93,"featured_media":0,"parent":7992,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"page-category":[716],"class_list":["post-9217","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","page-category-divi"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/93"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9217"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9217\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18678,"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9217\/revisions\/18678"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"page-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cldc.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/page-category?post=9217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}